(46-6) 13 * << * >> * Русский * English * Содержание * Все выпуски

Experimental assessment of the distance measurement accuracy using the active-pulse television measuring system and a digital terrain model
V.V. Kapustin 1, A.S. Zahlebin 1, A.K. Movchan 1, M.I. Kuryachiy 1, M.V. Krutikov 1

1 Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics,
634050, Russia, Tomsk, Lenina ave, 40

 PDF, 4221 kB

DOI: 10.18287/2412-6179-CO-1114

Страницы: 948-954.

Язык статьи: English.

Аннотация:
This paper considers an experimental study of the layout of an active-pulse television measuring system in the problem of assessing the accuracy of measuring the distance to objects using the depth maps. The main technical characteristics and structure of the active-pulse television measuring system layout are described, the description of the multi-zone ranging method used in the experiment is given. The field tests were carried out using a system for terrain orthophotomaps construction by an unmanned aerial vehicle and a geodetic measuring instrument, which is a reference for building a terrain plan and fixing distances between objects on the ground. The technique of carrying out aerial work is described to obtain the necessary data array, on which a digital model and an orthophotomap of the area were subsequently built. Conclusions are drawn about the accuracy of digital terrain models built based on the results of aerial photography from an unmanned aerial vehicle with a geodetic receiver on board and the applicability of these data as reference data for testing a prototype of an active-pulse television measuring system.

Ключевые слова:
depth maps, range measurement, terrain orthophotomap, digital terrain model, active-pulse television measuring system.

Благодарности
The study was carried out at the expense of a grant from the Russian Science Foundation № 21-79-10200 in TUSUR.

Citation:
Kapustin VV, Zahlebin AS, Movchan AK, Kuryachiy MI, Krutikov MV. Experimental assessment of the distance measurement accuracy using the active-pulse television measuring system and a digital terrain model. Computer Optics 2022; 46(6): 948-954. DOI: 10.18287/2412-6179-CO-1114.

References:
  1. Busck J, Heiselberg H. Gated viewing and high-accuracy three-dimensional laser radar. Appl Opt 2004; 43(24): 4705-4710. DOI: 10.1364/AO.43.004705.
  2. Sun HY, Guo HC, Li YC. Performance analysis of range-gated active imaging system. Proc SPIE 2009; 7382: 73822E. DOI: 10.1117/12.835576.
  3. Laurenzis M, Christnacher F, Monnin D, Zielenski I. 3D range-gated imaging in scattering environments. Proc SPIE 2010; 7684: 768406. DOI: 10.1117/12.849630.
  4. Artamonov SI, Gryaznov NA, Kharlamov VV, Romanov NA, Sosnov EN. Analytical review of the development of laser location systems. Indian J Sci Technol 2017; 10(15): 1-10. DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2017/v10i15/106332.
  5. David O, Kopeika NS, Weizer B. Range gated active night vision system for automobiles. Appl Opt 2006; 45(28): 7248-7254. DOI: 10.1364/AO.45.007248.
  6. Mariani P, Quincoces I, Haugholt KH, Chardard Y, Visser AW, Yates C, Piccinno G, Reali G, Risholm P, Thielemann JT. Range-gated imaging system for underwater monitoring in ocean environment. Sustainability 2019; 11: 162. DOI: 10.3390/su11010162.
  7. Kapustin VV, Movchan AK, Kuryachiy MI. Vision area parameters analysis for active-pulse television-computing systems. 2017 Int Siberian Conf on Control and Communications (SIBCON) 2017; 1-5. DOI: 10.1109/SIBCON.2017.7998432.
  8. Kapustin V, Movchan A, Kuryachiy M, Chaldina E. Active-pulse television measuring systems images space-time filtration by range. J Phys Conf Ser 2020; 1488: 012032. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1488/1/012032.
  9. Wang X, Zhou Y, Fan S, Liu Y, Liu H. Echo broadening effect in range-gated active imaging technique. Proc SPIE 2009; 7382: 738211. DOI: 10.1117/12.836025.
  10. Gruber T, Bijelic M, Ritter W, Dietmayer KC. (2019). Gated imaging for autonomous driving in adverse weather. Source: <https://vision4allseasons.files.wordpress.com/2019/06/abstract_gated.pdf>.
  11. Andersson P. Long-range three-dimensional imaging using range-gated laser radar images. Opt Eng 2006; 45(3): 034301. DOI: 10.1117/1.2183668.
  12. Laurenzis M, Christnacher F, Monnin D. Long-range three-dimensional active imaging with superresolution depth mapping. Opt Lett 2007; 32(21): 3146-3148. DOI: 10.1364/OL.32.003146.
  13. Xinwei W, Youfu L, Yan Z. Triangular-range-intensity profile spatial-correlation method for 3D super-resolution range-gated imaging. Appl Opt 2013; 52(30): 7399-7406. DOI: 10.1364/AO.52.007399.
  14. Xiuda Z, Huimin Y, Yanbing J. Pulse-shape-free method for long-range three-dimensional active imaging with high linear accuracy. Opt Lett 2008; 33(11): 1219-1221. DOI: 10.1364/OL.33.001219.
  15. Jin C, Sun X, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Liu L. Gain-modulated three-dimensional active imaging with depth-independent depth accuracy. Opt Lett 2009; 34(22): 3550-3552. DOI: 10.1364/OL.34.003550.
  16. Gruber T, Kokhova M, Ritter W, Haala N, Dietmayer K. Learning super-resolved depth from active gated imaging. 2018 21st Int Conf on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018: 3051-3058. DOI: 10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569590.
  17. Zhang C, Kovacs JM. The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: A review. Precis Agric 2012; 13: 693-712. DOI: 10.1007/s11119-012-9274-5.
  18. Zakhlebin AS, Kalibekov A, Smoking MI. Construction of geo-linked orthophotoplane of the terrain from images from the television camera of helicopter-type UAVs [In Russian]. Electronic Means and Control Systems: Mater Dock Int Scientific-Prakt Conf, Tomsk, 2020; 1-2: 187-189.
  19. Štroner M, Urban R, Reindl T, Seidl J, Broucek J. Evaluation of the georeferencing accuracy of a photogrammetric model using a quadrocopter with onboard GNSS RTK. Sensors 2020; 20(8): 2318. DOI: 10.3390/s20082318.
  20. Hugenholtz C, Brown O, Walker J, Barchyn T, Nesbit P, Kucharczyk M, Myshak S. Spatial accuracy of UAV-derived orthoimagery and topography: comparing photogrammetric models processed with direct geo-referencing and ground control points. Geomatica 2016; 70(1): 21-30. DOI: 10.5623/cig2016-102.
  21. Altwaijry H, Trulls E, Hays J, Fua P, Belongie S. Learning to match aerial images with deep attentive architectures. 2016 IEEE Conf on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2016: 3539-3547. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.385.
  22. Zakhlebin AS. Method of terrain orthofotoplanes construction using unmanned quadrocopter equipped with navigation geodetic receiver [In Russian]. Reports of TUSUR 2021; 3(24): 44-49.
  23. Zakhlebin AS. Aerial photography processing method for building a georeferenced orthophotomap of the area using the television camera of the DJI Phantom 4 PRO unmanned aerial vehicle [In Russian]. AS HS RF Reports 2021; 4(53): 26-35.
  24. Coppa U, Guarnieri A, Pirotti F, Vettore A. Accuracy enhancement of unmanned helicopter positioning with low cost system. Appl Geomat 2009; 1: 85-95. DOI: 10.1007/s12518-009-0009-x.
  25. Haarbrink RB, Eisenbeiss H. Accurate DSM production from unmanned helicopter systems. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 2008; XXXVII(B1): 1259-1264. DOI: 10.3929/ETHZ-B-000011976.
  26. Korshunov RA, Noskov VV, Pogorelov VV. Non-central reverse photogrammetric notch [In Russian]. News of Higher Educational Institutions. Geodesy and Aerial Photography 2013; 5: 67-71.
  27. Chaldina ES, Movchan AK, Kapustin VV, Kuryachiy MI. Multi-area range measurement method using active-pulse television measuring systems. 2020 21st Int Conf of Young Specialists on Micro/Nanotechnologies and Electron Devices (EDM) 2020: 293-297. DOI: 10.1109/EDM49804.2020.9153500. GOST R 59328-2021.
  28. Aerial photography topographic. Technical requirements [In Russian]. Moscow: "Standartinform" Publisher; 2021.

© 2009, IPSI RAS
Россия, 443001, Самара, ул. Молодогвардейская, 151; электронная почта: journal@computeroptics.ru; тел: +7 (846) 242-41-24 (ответственный секретарь), +7 (846) 332-56-22 (технический редактор), факс: +7 (846) 332-56-20