Impulse response identification for remote sensing images using gis data
A.Y. Denisova, V.V. Sergeyev

 

Image Processing Systems Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

Full text of article: Russian language.

 PDF

Abstract:
In this article the authors describe a new modification of the spectrum method that uses a known relation between the energy spectra of input and output signals to identify a linear observation model. The input undistorted image is assumed to be unknown. The modification proposed in this article uses known borders of image objects to construct an image with the energy spectrum similar to that of the original undistorted image.

Keywords:
identification, linear observation model, impulse response, energy spectrum, frequency response, energy spectrum method, geoinformation data.

Citation:
Denisova AY, Sergeev VV. Impulse response identification for remote sensing images using gis data. Computer Optics 2015; 39(4): 557-63. DOI: 10.18287/0134-2452-2015-39-4-557-563.

References:

  1. Schowengerdt RA. Remote sensing: models and methods for image processing. New York: Academic Press Inc; 2006.
  2. Goriachkin OV, Erina EI. Blind channel identification by manifolds of given correlation generated by random polynoms. Achievements of Modern Radioelectronics 2008; (8): 70-7.
  3. Tong L, Xu G, Hassibi B, Kailath T. Blind channel identification based on second-order statistics: A frequency-domain approach. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on 1995; 41(1): 329-34.
  4. Tong L, Xu G, Kailath T. A new approach to blind identification and equalization of multipath channels. Signals, Systems and Computers, 1991. 1991 Conference Record of the Twenty-Fifth Asilomar Conference on 1991; 856-60.
  5. Tong L, Xu G, Kailath T. Blind identification and equalization based on second-order statistics: A time domain approach. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on 1994; 40(2): 340-9.
  6. Sergeyev VV, Denisova AY. Spectral-Energy Identification Method of the Linear Observation Model for Remote Sensing of the Earth. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis 2011; 21(2): 321-3.
  7. Sergeyev VV, Denisova AY. Spectral energy identification method of the linear observation model in the absence of a covariance function model. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis 2014; 24(4): 561-5.
  8. Soifer VA. Computer Image Processing, Part II: Methods and algorithms. VDM Verlag, 2009.
  9. Ljung L. System identification. Birkhäuser Boston, 1998.
  10. Marpl SL. Numeric Spectral Analysis and Its Applications. Moscow: “Mir” Publisher, 1990.
  11. Sergeyev VV, Sigunova ON. An algorithm of generation of test mosaic images. Science research automation, Kuybyshev: Kuybyshevs aviation institute; 1984. 129-34.
  12. Justice CO, Vermote E, Townshend JRG, Defries R, Roy  DP. The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS): Land remote sensing for global change research. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on 1998; 36(4): 1228-49.
  13. Guenther B, Xiong X, Salomonson VV, Barnes WL, Young J. On-orbit performance of the Earth Observing System Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer; first year of data. Remote Sensing of Environment 2002; 83(1). 16-30.
  14. Storey JC. Landsat 7 on-orbit modulation transfer function estimation. International Symposium on Remote Sensing; International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2001; 50-61.
  15. Park SK, Schowengerdt R, Kaczynski MA. Modulation-transfer-function analysis for sampled image systems. Applied Optics 1984; 23(15): 2572-82.
© 2009, IPSI RAS
151, Molodogvardeiskaya str., Samara, 443001, Russia; E-mail:journal@computeroptics.ru; Tel: +7 (846) 242-41-24 (Executive secretary), +7 (846) 332-56-22 (Issuing editor), Fax: +7 (846) 332-56-20